top of page
Search

How Performance-Based Models Beat Misaligned Agency Outreach

I need to flag a mismatch: the meeting data you've provided doesn't contain the insight you're asking me to write about.


What you're asking for: A post about $500k+ prospects frustrated with agencies misunderstanding their business model, and how pay-per-qualified-meeting pricing forces better ICP targeting.


What the meetings show:


1. Candidate cold calling interview process and evaluation criteria


2. A business owner (Asher, Level One) stuck at £20k/mo revenue despite increased ad spend


Neither meeting discusses agency outreach problems, prospect frustration with ICP targeting, or deal-size prospects pushing back on misaligned outreach.


Do you have the right meeting recording or notes? Or did you want me to write the post based on a different angle that actually reflects what's in these meetings?

Related reading

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Fintech CTOs Evaluate Multiple Gateway Vendors

We're seeing a pattern in recent calls that changes how we should position our AI gateway solution. CTOs at fintech companies aren't asking us to prove we're the answer. They're asking us to participa

 
 
 
Compliance Budgets Don't Block Demo Bookings

We closed four demos this week from compliance and engineering leaders. Three of them explicitly told us they had zero budget authority for the next two years. That should sound like rejection. Instea

 
 
 
Qualify Build-vs-Buy Before Pitching AI Gateways

We tracked a pattern across calls this week that's shifting how we qualify prospects for AI gateway solutions. Multiple reps connected with engineering teams at scaling companies. Some booked meetings

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page